The Consequences of Rationalizing Politics: The Closure of Al Jazeera and Fining Qatar 1 Trillion USD
The International Center for Geopolitical and Economic Studies (ICGER) published a study by its president and founder, Dr. Youssef, in which he revealed the material laws governing the political sphere, thus “rationalizing” politics and transforming it into an exact science rather than a branch of the human or social sciences or merely an “art” as some describe it. He also called for the closure of Qatar’s Al Jazeera, and for holding both Qatar and Al Jazeera accountable before international courts and fining it one trillion US dollars for the harm it has caused to people in the Middle East.
In “ The Rationalization of Politics: An Antidote in the Face of Disinformation – Al Jazeera as Example,” Dr. Youssef revealed several material laws of politics, such as the Fundamental Political Stability Law, the Law of Stability Preservation (Formative Facts), the Fundamental Political Disturbance Law (Law of Conflicting Political and Economic Facts), the Fundamental Political Mobilization Law, and the Law of Measuring the Geopolitical Potency of a Political Fact.
Additionally, Dr. Youssef identified the energy levels between which political events transition. He established the foundations for creating a scientific index that measures political events, which is the index to monitor political events. He developed an artificial intelligence program based on the center’s database to monitor geopolitical and strategic events before they occur.
Dr. Youssef stated that the comparison of political science to the other sciences engenders several implications:
– Prohibiting political work for non-experts who ignore the material and scientific laws and principles of political science:
– Prohibiting deceiving and misinforming people in politics and criminalizing, prosecuting, and fining those who violate these rules.
The rationalization of medicine, pharmacy, and engineering not only engendered the emergence of experts in these fields but also prohibited non-experts from misleading the public and prosecuting them for fraud and malpractice. Whoever is prosecuted and found guilty of any of
these crimes can be sentenced to time in prison and fined commensurately to the gravity of the crime and to secure appropriate reparations for those affected.
This is the norm today, and criminal laws are in place to prosecute these actions. It became extremely difficult to commit fraud malpractice and to mislead the public in the previously mentioned scientific fields without facing grave consequences. This is the result of the rationalization of these fields of study and the uncovering of their laws.
If fraud, misinformation, and malpractice are outlawed in the sciences, they should be outlawed in politics, and those engaging in these practices should be tried, convicted, and fined without labeling this request as idealist.
Similarly, when the science of politics becomes rationalized, and its laws and principles are uncovered, the same consequences will follow: those who commit malpractice, fraud, and misinformation in politics should be prosecuted, jailed, and fined.
Being an expert is a requirement to appear on international science channels and publish in scientific journals after fulfilling stringent conditions and thorough checks on academic integrity.
Likewise, in politics, preventing fraud, disinformation, and deception that have proliferated lately compels us to reconsider what is published and broadcasted in the news media, think tanks, and research centers.
A glaring example of what preceded this is the Qatari Al Jazeera news channel. It masked this fact by hiring an extensive network of correspondents around the world, on which it spent considerable amounts of money, and hosted hordes of Arab nationalists and Muslim extremists who condoned and called for terrorism and defended it in all possible ways.
It hosted whoever was available of the pseudo “political analysts” and “strategic experts,” who only regurgitated what served the interests of Al Jazeera and Qatar.
They presented schisms as unifying causes, catastrophes as great victories, and defeats as conquests, using disinformation and straight-out lies for over a quarter of a century, misleading simple folks into believing that what happened to their countries were great historical strides. They exploited the people’s desire and need for any kind of relief. To this end, Al Jazeera mobilized unemployed, retired military personnel from Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, and Syria, who, in return, served the interests of Al Jazeera and Qatar by marketing their political stances without any questioning or accountability for their support of terrorism and extremism, and their chauvinistic rhetoric against other nations and countries.”
He concluded by saying: “To keen observers, this policy implies two things:
1- Just as fraud and swindling are prohibited according to Islamic law, to which Al Jazeera dedicated a show called “Al Sharia wal Hayat,” and paid Islamic scholar Yusuf Al-Qadawi to appear weekly and promote this content, fraudulent opinions and ideas are also prohibited by Islamic law.
2- Had Al Jazeera hired pseudo-doctors, pharmacists, and engineers to lie on its screen for 25 years, misdiagnosing people and prescribing false medications, wouldn’t it be a duty to sue Al Jazeera and Qatar with the ICC and punish and fine them for their actions? Similarly, Al Jazeera and Qatar ought to be sued for the frauds they committed in politics and strategy. Al Jazeera should be shut down, and Qatar fined a trillion dollars to be paid to the nations and people against which Al Jazeera incited hatred and to the public who watched it since its launch because they are the victims of its lies.”